the Magicball Network Forums

the Magicball Network Forums (https://forum.magicball.net/index.php)
-   Off topic (https://forum.magicball.net/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   The Hi-tech thread (Hoverboards,slowmos and Spaceeeeee) (https://forum.magicball.net/showthread.php?t=9247)

Odysseus 2008-06-20 15:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkflame (Post 354205)
http://spaceflightnow.com/mars/phoen...phoenixice.gif
http://spaceflightnow.com/mars/phoenix/080620ice.html

Thats it folks.
If it looks like Ice, and starts evaporating*, then its Ice. :D
Water on mars, quite near the surface too, and when it melts you get mud.

*well, sublimation actualy

:eek:

Jasiek 2008-06-20 18:15

Funny how groundbraking this is, and seems not much people giva a damn...

"The planet is fine. The PEOPLE, are fucked!" ~George Carlin

Odysseus 2008-06-20 18:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasiek (Post 354225)
Funny how groundbraking this is, and seems not much people giva a damn...

"The planet is fine. The PEOPLE, are fucked!" ~George Carlin

Well of cause there where already a lot of clues, theories and some say proof, that there was/is water on Mars -and elsewhere.
But yeah, to see these pictures was not like anything else I seen.

Darkflame 2008-06-20 18:29

Well, like most things its a steady increase of evidence, rather then a sudden "Here it is" thing.
Really, the shiny white surface they saw last week was pretty close, but there was still the posibility it was salt. Now we have it melting, we know its almost certainly water ice.

It also explains why the samples they tried too take were intialy lumpy and wouldnt shake free of the robotic scope, but after a few days they did.
Basicaly, the water evaporated off, and when it was dry it was free to fall down.

Jasiek 2008-06-20 18:44

I mean I can't see it in the news here, anywhere. Some talked about it in the radio in the morning... and that's it. Instead they're talking about political shit all day...

Darkflame 2008-06-20 21:17

The utter crapness of humanity that is.
No concept of whats important for the species, merely (at best) whats important for a sub-set for the next few months.

Disgusting really.

ChaosFish 2008-06-20 22:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkflame (Post 354242)
The utter crapness of humanity that is.
No concept of whats important for the species, merely (at best) whats important for a sub-set for the next few months.

Disgusting really.

I completely agree, 100%.

With that, I'm sorry but I'm ignorant. Why is water so important? Because it means there could be life? If so, why does it mean that?

Kobold 2008-06-20 22:28

Life on a different planet would be in totally different conditions than the life of Earth anyway. What water means is just a step to that humans could live on this planet, (provided air).

Quetch 2008-06-20 22:37

funny how people can get so anxious about such an insignificant thing ... I mean the local newspaper is more interesting than this ... I mean what's the big deal ??? yeah, H2O is present on Mars ... wow .. so what ? like this is gonna prevent you from having a heart attack 2 weeks from now or like it's gonna help you not get hit by a car tomorrow morning ... this is stupid. Focus on everyday aspects people, cause chances are the ozone layer will get so thin, we'll all die quick, or some catastrophic event will occur and destroy life as we know it (because of our own doing, of course) and we will STILL not get to see the importance of Mars's water ... and back to the all so fascinating "alien" syndrome everybody seems to be affected by, let me tell u how I feel: sick ... I don't care about water ... that proves shit ... I wanna see an alien, not some substance which MAY HAVE been able to sustain a freaking life form ... everybody expects aliens in the presence of water ... I just expect veggies ;) case rested

Jasiek 2008-06-20 23:00

Quetch, it's about possible future colonisation and possibly terraforming, everyone are keeping thumbs up for life, but that's just an option. I can't see how someone might think that the future act of creation that will be done by the human race is less siginificant then daily lives of individuals. Humanity has no goals and dreams - those could put us on the tright track.

And please... all that "we'll destroy ourseves" nonsense again... we didn't kill ourselves off during the cold war although it was close, we're not going to now. It's a naive thought actually, not really based on observation. If you examine the worldwide trends and advance in technology you can't feel pesimist about the race(trends! Less war, less poverty, more sustainable and open source technologies).

ChaosFish 2008-06-20 23:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quetch (Post 354257)
funny how people can get so anxious about such an insignificant thing ... I mean the local newspaper is more interesting than this ... I mean what's the big deal ??? yeah, H2O is present on Mars ... wow .. so what ? like this is gonna prevent you from having a heart attack 2 weeks from now or like it's gonna help you not get hit by a car tomorrow morning ... this is stupid. Focus on everyday aspects people, cause chances are the ozone layer will get so thin, we'll all die quick, or some catastrophic event will occur and destroy life as we know it (because of our own doing, of course) and we will STILL not get to see the importance of Mars's water ... and back to the all so fascinating "alien" syndrome everybody seems to be affected by, let me tell u how I feel: sick ... I don't care about water ... that proves shit ... I wanna see an alien, not some substance which MAY HAVE been able to sustain a freaking life form ... everybody expects aliens in the presence of water ... I just expect veggies ;) case rested

I'm so tempted to say this...
Can't resist... sorry. :o

NO. YOU'RE STUPID.

(that was refreshing)

Anyway... Some people see themselves as a part of something bigger. Big inspirations and taking care of future generation and that kind of weird stuff... go figure.

(edit: this might not be the best answer, reading it again... meh)

Jasiek 2008-06-20 23:05

Speaking of human creation, I wonder what kind of a parent will the human race be when the singularity comes.

ChaosFish 2008-06-20 23:09

Care to elaborate?

Odysseus 2008-06-20 23:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasiek (Post 354264)
Speaking of human creation, I wonder what kind of a parent will the human race be when the singularity comes.

http://i29.tinypic.com/4pwdnt.jpg

Lol nurture that. :P
Made the cartoon yesterday.:p

Quetch 2008-06-20 23:12

@CF: don't worry, I was expecting an answer like that :p actually many more :D but I do expect some proof reflecting the fact that what I've said is a childish and narrow-minded nonsense :p
@Jas: are you referring to the point where the human race will be on the verge of having a single individual left standing ?

Jasiek 2008-06-20 23:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosFish (Post 354265)
Care to elaborate?


"The technological singularity is a hypothesised point in the future variously characterized by the technological creation of self-improving intelligence, unprecedentedly rapid technological progress, or some combination of the two."


Basicly it's a term used for the time computational power will be great enough to contain a consciousness, wich will then self improve itself beyond whatever a human can possibly conceive.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quetch (Post 354270)
@Jas: are you referring to the point where the human race will be on the verge of having a single individual left standing ?

Nonsense! No such thing happening. The Human race has progressively gone better, not worse. Really, where does that view come from - like there was a time in history we (as a species) where better off...

ChaosFish 2008-06-20 23:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quetch (Post 354270)
@CF: don't worry, I was expecting an answer like that :p actually many more :D but I do expect some proof reflecting the fact that what I've said is a childish and narrow-minded nonsense :p

Well what I meant to write was,

Mars is so far the only planet we can reach, besides our home planet.
Even though I don't know why specifically water is so important, I do understand it's important on a whole other (bigger) scale than finding the cure for heart attacks.
Expanding our information of the world and finding new things is the kind of stuff that can lead to finding a cure to heart attacks.

ChaosFish 2008-06-20 23:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasiek (Post 354271)

"The technological singularity is a hypothesised point in the future variously characterized by the technological creation of self-improving intelligence, unprecedentedly rapid technological progress, or some combination of the two."


Basicly it's a term used for the time computational power will be great enough to contain a consciousness, wich will then self improve itself beyond whatever a human can possibly conceive.

Ah.

Jasiek 2008-06-20 23:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quetch (Post 354270)
@Jas: are you referring to the point where the human race will be on the verge of having a single individual left standing ?

Nonsense! No such thing happening. The Human race has progressively gone better, not worse, really, where does that view come from - like there was a time in history we (as a species) where better off...

ChaosFish 2008-06-20 23:25

Would be an interesting experience to preform though, killing all humans except one and see what happens.

Jasiek 2008-06-20 23:26

Well not really that hard to predict... he/she'll roam the ruins for a few years... become a little more savage, and then die from some silly disease or in an accident...

ChaosFish 2008-06-20 23:29

Well that's your hypothesis.

Jasiek 2008-06-20 23:38

Well what else? No way that person could recreate the species... you'd need at least like 300... if not more.

Quetch 2008-06-20 23:44

mine too ... you would survive a couple of weeks, until all supplies would get rotten , smelly and uneatable ... they would not run out, just rot duh ... and since one man cannot maintain a factory to produce food (whatever that is), he'll just eat what he still has ... eventually, just fruits and perhaps he'll die due to inadaptation ... who knows ..

CF: well I know it seems like scratching the surface of something which has HUGE potential of getting us further somewhere in the future, but that's just theory ... meanwhile, my universe revolves around me, those around me and the normal stuff ....I don't care whether Apathos will crash into the Earth in 2029 or 2036, I don't care if Planet X aka NIBIRU will also crash on us .... I don't care ... that's beyond my power of acting so I'm (we all are, even though we think we aren't) helpless when we're faced with the whole Universe ... so until people can manipulate matter and shit, thus ruling the universe, I'll worry about my exams, my health, the wellbeing of my home, my friends, family, loved ones and I'll work hard to graduate and finish the game I'm working on with Jasiek :)

Jas: this is just me, don't say I didn't mention this :p so here it goes: we were wayy better off before ... again, just my opinion ;)

Jasiek 2008-06-20 23:50

Before what? When? There is no golden age in the history of the humans species (non that we have proof of at least)... You want one, you work for it. Anyway I would like to add that it's people with their minds in the clouds who always push the species further, not the people who only look after themselves.

That's why we are stagnant these days. Back when the airplane was first made, it was something everyone was doing, 3 years after the Wrights' demonstration in Paris the world had thousands of airplanes. Now when it comes to airplane speeds we're stuck in the 60's.... also there are plans to repeat in 20 years what we achieved 30 years ago...

There will be no achievement, no greater world if people are not willing to commit to a romantic cause, be interested in it, instead of just going on by their daily lives...

Quetch 2008-06-20 23:58

if I consider the situation opposite, meaning that the further we advance, the worse we get, wouldn't it sound normal to you that I do NOT want what you call a "better" world ??? don't you think my judgement would rather stick to this stage rather than going downhill even more ? anyway, back on topic, Hi-Tech and shit :p

RGaspar 2008-06-21 00:23

I thought water on Mars was already confirmed years ago.

LOL. I'm in my own private world xDDD

And things are going on before they happen in reality XDDD

Darkflame 2008-06-21 00:40

Quote:

I'll worry about my exams, my health, the wellbeing of my home, my friends, family, loved ones
Scientific development will effect all of that.
Just because you cant make a 1:1 link between things dosnt mean it dosnt.

Personaly, I find it rather horrible to only think of only things that effect yourself, and not worry about the future for your decendants.
Water on Mars is just one of many things that gives our species a chance in the long term, and greater understanding in the shorter term.

RGaspar 2008-06-21 00:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkflame (Post 354288)
Scientific development will effect all of that.
Just because you cant make a 1:1 link between things dosnt mean it dosnt.

Personaly, I find it rather horrible to only think of only things that effect yourself, and not worry about the future for your decendants.

Second that!

In fact every country has built technology thinking in long terms.

The fathers and grandfathers of Computers aren't alive now, they couldn't see all the fruits of their labor but they worked knowing it would be a future :D.

--------------------

And for example wikipedia: it's planned for exist as much as electronics exist. And engineering tunnels, bridges, etc.

---------------------

And thinking about the future is one of the reasons we need to be ecologicals

Darkflame 2008-06-21 01:01

Quote:

if I consider the situation opposite, meaning that the further we advance, the worse we get, wouldn't it sound normal to you that I do NOT want what you call a "better" world ??? don't you think my judgement would rather stick to this stage rather than going downhill even more ? anyway, back on topic, Hi-Tech and shit
You say that but would really like to live with the jobs, medicine,comminication and entertainment from 100 years ago?

======================

The Singularity;

Personaly, I dont view this as anything to do with A.I.
While artifial inteligence may develop, I see the singularity as mearly the therotical vertical line of infinite human technological development.

While thats impossible to reach in absolute terms, it is like one of those exponetial curves.
In terms of technology are rate of development has been increaseing by a mind-blowing rate.
A lot of technology we make, actualy increase the rate we can develope technologys. This is the key to the whole thing, imho.

Its like the invention of the microscope....sure, it was a cool thing in itself...but what it helped us learn elsewhere was even bigger.
Much the same goes for telescopes, or xrays, or all the other inventions that shows us new ways to look at our world.

Nowdays we not only have these inventions helping us study the universe in new ways, but we also have inventions (like the Internet) rapidly increasing our access to knowledge and ability to communicate. First mankind wrote the book....limited to a few individuals who could write....transcribed by a few...only available to the very very rich and the knowledge contained was limited in how it spread over the population. Then we had the printing press...making cheap books possible. Increasing the spread of knowledge. Giving the general man education. Now we have the internet. Which makes us all authors, and all readers whenever we want, for very little cost.
The skills contained in books and passed on ver forms other then word of mouth led to society's of sophistication enough to built a printing press. The printing press, likewise, advanced the average skill and knowledge of society enough to be ready for electronics, and eventually the internet.

Just think of a second how profound our power is;
Almost everyone in developed countrys now has access to..more or less...all of humanitys knowledge...almost instantly.

Thats utterly staggering, and I dont think as a species we fully grasp that yet.
The rate of change is increase.
THATS the singularity to me.

Its the curve, flying skywards.
We are the first generation really to have no idea what the would will be like in just a few decades. A few generations back, the world would be more or less the same over the course of a lifetime.
Nowdays? We havnt a clue!
Thats what makes this such an exciting time to live.

Water on Mars?
We actualy sent a probe, too mars, it dug up some ice, and we saw it without mere hours relayed to millions of people ver a network of computers spaning the world.

OMFG, come on, isn't that awesome?
Its even more incredible the fact we take this stuff for grantage.

Water on Mars?
Frecking excelent.
That makes a colony a thousand fold more likely.
Sure maybe not in our lifetime...but I dont care.
The fact its possible makes me happy for my species.
WE did this, WE found this out.
With all the other human shit in the world, its this stuff that makes me proud.

Heck, and water is really essential for life as we know it, so the chances of bacteria, or maybe even fossils on mars also skyrockets.

Quote:

That's why we are stagnant these days. Back when the airplane was first made, it was something everyone was doing, 3 years after the Wrights' demonstration in Paris the world had thousands of airplanes. Now when it comes to airplane speeds we're stuck in the 60's.... also there are plans to repeat in 20 years what we achieved 30 years ago...
Thats because the aviation market is pretty maxed out.
The speeds havnt gone up, but costs have gone down.
We can go on hollidays for stupidly low prices...purhapes too low...theres no driving force to push the technology because (as far as the market goes) its saturated.

Thats why theres all this investment in spaceplanes, and upper-atmosphere aircraft.
We arnt achieving what we done 30 years ago because its been done.
We are achiveing, or trying too, new things.
Is this not development?: http://www.space.com/news/080620-vir...dventures.html
(of course, seeing Concord end for utterly stupid reasons was still sad :( )

Also, if you want to look at "years" after an invention as demostration of progress, then,bloody hell, it dosnt support your stagation view at all!

The time from technological invention, to mass market has never been quicker.
Your right to say the future has to be worked for,and especialy "minds in the clouds who always push the species further," but enough people are like that, and it is being pushed. Faster then ever. :)

Purhapes the only difference is its much harder to put a single persons face to an invention or discovery these days, but that dosnt mean they arnt being made.

Darkflame 2008-06-21 01:14

sorry about the long post, btw, Its just I find human development in the last century compared to the last thousand years just staggering.

Jasiek 2008-06-21 02:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quetch (Post 354285)
if I consider the situation opposite, meaning that the further we advance, the worse we get, wouldn't it sound normal to you that I do NOT want what you call a "better" world ??? don't you think my judgement would rather stick to this stage rather than going downhill even more ? anyway, back on topic, Hi-Tech and shit :p

Well there isn't really anything to consider here, our society, our well-being(as a species) is the best since... ever. The more developed the science, the less damage to the environment to a point where there will be none.

The only thing you can try and argue is that you hate the species for some reason. Wich is entirely your own view, one wich I can't comprehend - and it has nothing to do with experience, treating a species as a whole like that is just, well, silly.

ChaosFish 2008-06-21 02:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkflame (Post 354302)
sorry about the long post, btw, Its just I find human development in the last century compared to the last thousand years just staggering.

NO SORRY. Perfect post. I love it. Excellent. That's exactly my opinion also, I couldn't have said better.

ChaosFish 2008-06-21 02:39

I always say to people who can't appreciate the Internet:
Remember those 80's-90's sci-fi movies, where a man walks into a big room, and there's this gigantic brain lying there on the floor? And the brain says: "I know everything. Ask any question and I will give you the answer." (Lol what an idea, not in our lifetime!)
Well that didn't come true. Instead you just type what you want in Google, who doesn't even have lobes.

Jasiek 2008-06-21 03:58

It's 3 in the morning, and ladies and gentlemen! We've got a little news piece here, that no one will see, cosue the morning news will be different...

ChaosFish 2008-06-21 04:18

Well no one except us vampires.

RGaspar 2008-06-21 06:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosFish (Post 354320)
Well no one except us vampires.

Vampires FTW!!!

IT's 1 in the morning :p

Back on topic

Quetch 2008-06-21 11:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasiek
The more developed the science, the less damage to the environment to a point where there will be none.

I really do think 200 years ago we were less of a danger to the environment than now ... not to mention 2000 years ago ;)

Darkflame 2008-06-21 11:34

There was a heck of a lot less people then too though, remember.

Generaly speaking, more advanced science does do less damage too the enviroment (mainly thanks to increased energy efficiancy).
However, the problem is what the general population use's lags quite a bit behind whats possible scientificaly. Commercial, Encomics/Market and Population really effect the enviroment more negatively then scientific progress.
Allthough, it does work both ways. Certainly some scientific inventions have had negative impacts.

But even look at something so casual as portable games consoles;
Back in 1989 the GameBoy had 4 AA battarys, a Green/Yellow screen, and the power of a ZX Spectrum (litttarly).
The battarys lasted about 4-5 hours.

In 2004 the GameBoyAdvanced used just 2AA battarys, had a 16bit colour screen, and the power of a err...well, a bit more then a Snes.
The battarys lasted almost 15 hours.

Now, its a bit harder to compare the SP/DS/DSlite ect, as they have built in battarys. The backlit screens naturaly take more power too.
But you see the progression in efficiancy here.
We are getting more, for less.
And this is a general trend in all of science/technology. getting more, for less.

Unfortuntely, as a soceity,we are often purhapes demanding too much resources in many ways. But technology is at least helping us get the most from them.

Quote:

Instead you just type what you want in Google, who doesn't even have lobes.
Thats what YOU think :p
Google's a massive mother-brain.

=====

And now for something completely different;

http://nl.wannahaves.com/item/babefd...n-in-het-water

Dolphine Boot thingy.
I've seen it before, but this video makes it look soooo fun :)

I want one.

LBAWinOwns 2008-06-21 12:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosFish (Post 354251)
I completely agree, 100%.

With that, I'm sorry but I'm ignorant. Why is water so important? Because it means there could be life? If so, why does it mean that?

Life at earth did most likely at first began in water, probably in deep cracks inside craters.

Additionally (I'm not sure about this), I think it's easier for whole-cell lifeforms to live in water, due to the nutrition can just 'flow in', also movement possibilities can easily be achieved with a tail.

Also, I've never heard of cyan-bacterias live on land...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kobold (Post 354254)
Life on a different planet would be in totally different conditions than the life of Earth anyway. What water means is just a step to that humans could live on this planet, (provided air).

You're kidding right? I've heard all the time that water is making it a lot more possible for life to ever existed, from various sources. Plus the above mentioned arguments...

Darkflame 2008-06-21 13:42

Water is certainly completely essential for live as we know it.
Every lifeform on earth needs water.

But we have such a limited sample range at the moment, its foolish to think life could only exist in conditions we know about.

Odysseus 2008-06-21 14:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quetch (Post 354326)
I really do think 200 years ago we were less of a danger to the environment than now ... not to mention 2000 years ago ;)

I think all these fruits of technology are a two sided sword. And in absolute terms i think i will agree on beeing more of a "danger" now then ever.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkflame (Post 354329)
(...)
Generaly speaking, more advanced science does do less damage too the enviroment (mainly thanks to increased energy efficiancy).
However, the problem is what the general population use's lags quite a bit behind whats possible scientificaly. Commercial, Encomics/Market and Population really effect the enviroment more negatively then scientific progress.
Allthough, it does work both ways. Certainly some scientific inventions have had negative impacts.

Yeah, the "problem" is efficiency is often about short time profit and not at all by long time quality of life. Some very efficient inventions are kept away from the market and others are put to work to keep the whole greed and ignorance based machine running.

Life standard to a lot of people has gone up but nothing comes for free. In fact all the comfort we can live in now I belief to alienate us from the environment. It isn't because of technologie it is cause of how we use it and what we use it for.

Quetch 2008-06-21 15:02

thank you Odysseus :)

Darkflame 2008-06-21 17:30

Quote:

Yeah, the "problem" is efficiency is often about short time profit and not at all by long time quality of life. Some very efficient inventions are kept away from the market and others are put to work to keep the whole greed and ignorance based machine running.
Not really, efficiancy is all about getting the result with the least effort.

While the intention of an increase in efficiancy in most cases isnt being better for the enviroment, the side effect is.
If it takes less energy, the customer saves money.
If it takes less resources to make, the manufacturer saves money.

Of course, this is a generalisation, but in most case's its true.

As for conspiracys, dont believe in them.
Except, that is, in case's where only one company would be controlling a product. Theres certainly dangers there. (Diamonds, for instance.)

If theres more then one company, its in their best interest to release a better product and outcompete the others. Like Philips with energy efficiant lightbulbs.
For the most part, its the consumer limiting uptake of new, better, technologys. Normaly for the most feable of reasons.
===
Of course, another problem is when technology is so intergrated into society its hard to switch. Like oil-based cars.
Theres plenty of companys wanting to make decent electric cars (or hydrogen) but petrol stations dont support it because there isnt enough cars too....you get a loop thats hard to escape.

Assassin 2008-06-21 19:54

I just downloaded this:

http://www.worldwidetelescope.org/

It's pretty cool. It's kind of like Google Earth but for space. You can see the universe like telescopes can see it. Zoom into parts of space and get a higher resolution image of that part of space. Don't expect to travel through space though, it's as it's seen from earth by telescopes. Still very interesting to look through, especially the tours.

Quetch 2008-06-21 21:28

lol I knew this program when it was in its early development stages :D great to see it's finally out !!!

Quetch 2008-06-21 23:11

sorry about going off topic a bit, but referring to my previous posts, where I've stated that the present human being has devolved instead of evolving, I just wanna add something. Apparently, I'm not the only one believing in this ... here's what some ancient greek myths say: "There is a certain music of the spheres, out there ... it is the fundamental expression of certain acoustic, harmonic and divine feelings, which can be heard, but only by the primordial man. The ear of the modern individual, the degraded one, has lost this ability, but love and spirituality can help him regain it, it can transport him to a certain area, where the sphere melodies can be heard once more."

I don't wanna say this reveals anything, it's just that I find this little story fascinating, at least for me ... forget I even said this is an addon to my previous statement ... just enjoy it :) it's weird ... it's like I knew this all along. Don't know why, but there's something about that phrase "the music of the spheres" which reminds me of something, long since forgotten.

Darkflame 2008-06-21 23:40

To start with, I'm not quite sure what ancient greek myths would know about evolution :p

But that aside, a species evolving dosnt mean it dosnt lose ability.
Merely that it gets better at fitting the enviroment.
I dont know about "music we cant hear", but we have lost much of our sense of smell.
Dosnt mean we havnt evolved, merely that we have adapted these days for other stuff :)

Quote:

"the music of the spheres"
It was familer to me too, so I used Google.
The phrase is used a hell of a lot, and the route seems to be the old myth.

Odysseus 2008-06-22 03:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkflame (Post 354349)
Not really, efficiancy is all about getting the result with the least effort.

While the intention of an increase in efficiancy in most cases isnt being better for the enviroment, the side effect is.
If it takes less energy, the customer saves money.
If it takes less resources to make, the manufacturer saves money.

Of course, this is a generalisation, but in most case's its true.

As for conspiracys, dont believe in them.
Except, that is, in case's where only one company would be controlling a product. Theres certainly dangers there. (Diamonds, for instance.)

If theres more then one company, its in their best interest to release a better product and outcompete the others. Like Philips with energy efficiant lightbulbs.
For the most part, its the consumer limiting uptake of new, better, technologys. Normaly for the most feable of reasons.
===
Of course, another problem is when technology is so intergrated into society its hard to switch. Like oil-based cars.
Theres plenty of companys wanting to make decent electric cars (or hydrogen) but petrol stations dont support it because there isnt enough cars too....you get a loop thats hard to escape.

Result and less effort yes. Speeding up processes and more profit, yes.

I know for a fact some very "efficient" inventions are being hold back. It is not some made up conspiracy. It's just how it works. It is companies buying the rights to things and not producing it so their position is kept more stable. Really it is not some weird conspiracy it's just buisness as usual.

Efficiancy has a lot of different meanings in a lot of different fields. In the end it is not the possibilities it is just how they are used.

ChaosFish 2008-06-22 15:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Odysseus (Post 354399)
I know for a fact some very "efficient" inventions are being hold back. It is not some made up conspiracy. It's just how it works. It is companies buying the rights to things and not producing it so their position is kept more stable. Really it is not some weird conspiracy it's just buisness as usual.

Yes, true. That's a crime against humanity. Intel for example, developed much more advanced CPU's than the ones they're selling today, but because of their monopoly the take the liberty of saving those up for when the CPU's they're currently selling aren't bringing them enough money.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:17.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, the Magicball Network