the Magicball Network Forums

the Magicball Network Forums (https://forum.magicball.net/index.php)
-   Off topic (https://forum.magicball.net/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   The Hi-tech thread (Hoverboards,slowmos and Spaceeeeee) (https://forum.magicball.net/showthread.php?t=9247)

ChaosFish 2007-11-03 22:41

About a), lots of people will get murdered :)

Jasiek 2007-11-03 23:10

:lol:
:sigh:

I meant the movie "1986"

:lol:

Jasiek 2007-11-05 01:48

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfKKy33rb0U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnwZmWoymeI

I'm so glad it's not dead :).

ChaosFish 2007-11-05 11:35

Space Elevator? You're kidding me?!

Wow :eek:

Darkflame 2007-11-05 12:28

Space Elevator's are wonderfull, as they are not only a fantasic littaral concept, but a great metaphor for raiseing humanity to a new level of development.
Something thats really hard to achieve, but once you have done it, it makes some things orders of magnatude easier then before.
(personaly I see the rise of an Augmented Reality Network a metaphorical space elivator).

Science of Discworld goes into this nicely.

Personaly, I dont like this "beaming power" stuff.
With a counter-balance system solar panels should be enough to move it up and down. (powered from the top).

Either way, I think Nasa should be investing completely in this.
Mars..the Moon, they are one stop things.
If you could build a space elivator...everything else becomes easy!

Jasiek 2007-11-05 12:42

Yeah, I've also been thinking of counter balance, we would have a system of to tapes next to each other, each system would be closed around 4 pulleys, two on the ground and two on the station, each system would have two elevators, one would counter balance the other when climbing. The countrer balance would be exchanged between the two tape systems on the space station. Instead installing the engine on the platform, we could minimize it's weight just by moving the elevators up and down by pulling the tapes with relative ease, thanks to the counter balance "falling" to earth.

Darkflame 2007-11-05 15:47

Yes, a counter balance system makes the most sense, then you only have to pull the wait of what your lifting, and not the list itself.

Still, I think what we need is an "in between" development, going straight to a SE is quite a massive step. If there was an in-between idea that developed the same technologys, but returned investiment sooner, then we would stand more chance of getting there.
===
Interesting;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xki9SboDn4Y

No clue how it works though.
Some sort of semi-transparent screen I guess.

Jasiek 2007-11-05 16:08

Hey, cool, probably Oleds on foil transparent plastic.

leoboe 2007-11-05 16:10

Or just a normal LCD-foil

it's without color so that would be most easy won't it?

Darkflame 2007-11-05 16:16

I didnt think colour LCD's could let in that much light though, seems most likely though.

Quote:

probably Oleds on foil transparent plastic.
Well, it seems to have the ability to block a varing amount of light.
Oleds are great because they can emit light without being backlite, but on their own they cant block light.

What gets me is the demo seemed to both controll the light colour as well as blocking it off.
Maybe a combination of LCDs + OLDs, or LCDs + projector/softtorchs.

Jasiek 2007-11-05 16:23

When they zoom in, you can see that it's some sort of foil on the window, you can see it's boundaries in the corners.

leoboe 2007-11-05 20:13

I think you missunderstood me DF
normal LCD-folies don't have colors they just can block the light
I also think that there are some lamps on every side of the window because you can see that she moves the lights up and down but notfrom left to right ;)

Jasiek 2007-11-05 23:02

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Gn0wtieMWo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVNqOS3HXuU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nveeGoLfPfo&NR=1

See related videos.

Darkflame 2007-11-06 09:39

Very cool.
or, rather hot.
Or, well, both at the same time :p

Quote:

normal LCD-folies don't have colors they just can block the light
Hence my pointing out it was colour.
The leafs looked clearly green in some shots. (even when the rest of the screen was pink...probably due to lights).

Jasiek 2007-11-13 00:04

First high-quality video of Lunar Surface - [Kaguya Explorer flight]

Darkflame 2007-11-13 11:44

nice

Darkflame 2007-11-14 08:10

Very nice interview here;

http://computerworld.com/action/arti...intsrc=kc_feat

I like that guy :p

Jasiek 2007-11-25 16:27

Now that's what I call raw power.

More on project orion:
http://www.nuclearspace.com/gallery_project_orion_2.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project..._propulsion%29


http://www.nuclearspace.com/images/g...1109113547.jpg

Darkflame 2007-11-28 18:25

Yes, heard about it before...seemed cool ,but a little unpractical.
---

Some robots;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tq8Yw...ief/022323.php

The modular one at the end is the really cool one.
Seems refined a bit since last time, allthough still needs speeding up.

Jasiek 2007-12-01 14:07

Yeah, that ship is a kind of an overkill, however, if we would ever have to mass evacuate earth, that would be the way to do it I think. Then accelerate the whole fleet to 1/10th of light speed and find a new home.

http://tides.ws/2007/11/06/the-futur...logy-its-here/

I love the Nokia arm band phone thing :D, I would definitely buy that.

Darkflame 2007-12-01 17:25

I would hope by that time we would have a better technology then letting off bombs behind us :p
Small amounts of antimater can boast fusion reactions a lot though, that would help.
--
Yeah, the arm band concept is cool, allthough Id like to go further.
Just littarly have a band...no screen(s).

Just have a cheap,smaller arm-band phone which is voice controlled and does nothing else :p
(there could be numbered buttons around the band too though)

The CD/MP3 player design is cool.
Simerla to how I thought Sony should have done the PSP, in fact. (rather then using those stupid UMDs).

Jasiek 2007-12-04 23:22

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ciMTqn3EmM

ChaosFish 2007-12-04 23:25

About that cell phone thing: I've never been a fan of cell phones. Some people have forgotten already, but cell phones emit dangerous radiation which can easily give you brain cancer if you're exposed to it too much. That's why I only use them when it's necessary (talking, sms'ing).

Jasiek 2007-12-05 00:02

And it's never been prooven. Anyway, in the overwhelming radiation-filled world of the modern times, I think people become more immune to it, children to age 7 develop radiation immunity - to some extent, I guess evolution will somehow do the rest.

Besides, what can you do, other then talking or sending text msgs, that will send a signal from the phone and make it emit waves??

ChaosFish 2007-12-05 10:35

People can develop immunity to radiation? Can you back this up by a source?
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasiek
Besides, what can you do, other then talking or sending text msgs, that will send a signal from the phone and make it emit waves??

Yeah maybe you're right. Still, radiation is invisible and it gives me the creeps.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:18.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, the Magicball Network