![]() |
|
![]() |
Welcome to the Magicball Network. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
General The general chatting goes on in here. That means talk about the LBA games and its world. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How would you name all the remakes of LBA?
As we all know, great video games need lots of remakes, and this need will never stop. For example if the metaverse gets ready for prime time in 10 years, then we'll need an "LBA: Metaverse edition".
How would you name all these remakes? For LBA there already a few, and the names of them have caused controversy. The most boring way would be "LBA1: Classic", "LBA1: Remake 1", "LBA1: Remake 2", etc. For comparison, according to Styx we have for LBA1: Twinsen's Little Big Adventure Classic 1 Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 1 Remastered Twinsen's Little Big Adventure Reboot And for Final Fantasy VII, there are: Final Fantasy VII Final Fantasy VII Remake Final Fantasy VII Remake Intergrade Final Fantasy VII Rebirth Final Fantasy VII Reunion |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
The FFVII names don't make more sense to be frank, but I think the problem with LBA is that they used synonyms. I mean, classic and original are way too close, so are remastered and reboot.
I mean, the original title is long enough, swap words and everyone will think it's witty... Big Little Adventure Little Big Beginning Little Bigger Adventure Iunno, I feel like it's just adding 2 and 2 together... Or if it's just a port that runs natively on Windows, don't make a new name for it, I mean it's the same game...
__________________
<((((((((((((([[[========================]]])))))))))))))> |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
The original name should have stayed intact for both the "modernized" version currently on GoG and Steam, as well as this new remaster they've announced. The only thing you need to put is a suffix to let people know what version it is.
__________________
"Because we don't know when we will die, we get to think of life as an inexhaustible well, yet everything happens only a certain number of times, and a very small number, really. How many more times will you remember a certain afternoon of your childhood, some afternoon that's so deeply a part of your being that you can't even conceive of your life without it? Perhaps four or five times more, perhaps not even that. How many more times will you watch the full moon rise? Perhaps twenty. And yet it all seems limitless." --- Paul Bowles |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 1 Classic Steam edition Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 2 Classic Steam edition Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 1 Original Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 2 Original Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 1 Classic GoG edition Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 2 Classic GoG edition Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 1 Remastered Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 2 Remastered Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 1 Remake Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 2 Remake Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 1 Reboot Twinsen's Little Big Adventure 2 Reboot (...)
__________________
Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Right?
LBA 1. LBA 2. and then LBA 3. Period.
__________________
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
LBA 5 : Relentless returns to the odyssey.
__________________
<((((((((((((([[[========================]]])))))))))))))> |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
![]() I guess business-wise the enhanced editions weren't a bad idea. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Those are essentially Windows 10 ports, but it was the same game... Just calling them LBA - Windows version would've been enough...
__________________
<((((((((((((([[[========================]]])))))))))))))> |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
So firstly, I'd combine the classic and classic original versions into one game with a bunch of features we can turn off or ignore (stuff like new game+). Besides that from what I can see there isn't much difference between "Classic" and "Classic original".
So we have those editions called simply "Little Big Adventure: Relentless" and "Little Big Adventure 2: Twinsen's Oddysey" (In both cases I've just put a bit of the American names after the colon.) After that, all other editions can be called "has no compelling reason to exist".
__________________
"The world won't end in darkness, it'll end in family fun With Coca Cola clouds behind a Big Mac sun" - Paul Heaton, "One God" |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Wait till Gabe Newell finds out that before he can release Half-Life 3, he must first release:
Gordon Freeman's Half-life 1 Classic Gordon Freeman's Half-life 2 Classic Gordon Freeman's Half-life 1 Remake Gordon Freeman's Half-life 2 Remake Gordon Freeman's Half-life 1 Reboot Gordon Freeman's Half-life 2 Reboot * whelp * I guess we all know why HL-3 is not confirmed yet.
__________________
Quote:
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
....Hahaha! But, jokes aside: There's a reason why LBA1 was marketed as Relentless in certain countries, just as LBA2 was named Twinsen's Odyssey.
In Brazil for instance, afaik, LBA1/Relenteless was never released here, so when the time for LBA2 came around they simply decided to call it Twinsen's Odyssey, and there are NO references in the game box, manual, or anywhere whatsoever that this game was a sequel. It was simply Twinsen's Odyssey, you installed the game and had fun. Period. And yet, nobody felt like that was a bad move that "confused LBA1's fans" nor did people not buy the game because "I don't know who Twinsen is". It's a bloody game, it looks cute and you buy it for your kids so they stop bothering around the house. And that was in the 90's, and yet, those who knew the first game were NOT confused about it being a sequel, I dont think I've ever come across anyone in this community who was confused about which is LBA1 and which is LBA2, they just probably looked at the different title name, thought nothing at all about it and carried on with their lifes like anybody else would. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Why is it called "Little Big Adventure" anyway? What does it mean? I like the name but don't get what it means exactly...other than it being an adventure that is, uh, little, but also kind of big.
__________________
https://soundcloud.com/robert-logan |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I think it's a typically french humour kind of name, as we see in a scene that they're really little (the size of a chess piece of our real world), so, these little people are living big adventures.
__________________
Quote:
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I've always thought it was some sort joking reference to the battle of Little Bighorn, or the movie Little Big Man.
Frankly, the Half-Life titles aren't very clear either chronologically speaking, but they certainly are better than the The LBA mess we have now
__________________
<((((((((((((([[[========================]]])))))))))))))> |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Blizzard isn't a private company ?
__________________
<((((((((((((([[[========================]]])))))))))))))> |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
There are several things to ponder.
I don't mind a remake or remaster, if above all else it is faithfully to the original spirit. Which between lba 1 and 2 is a complete different beast alltogether. but most importantly, a new company should have focus, one message, one strategy, one game, one artwork direction. We now have seen 3 different artwork styles, the wimpy twinsen, pictures of the reboot, and now a cartoony remake. Whoever is in charge should make up his mind. Now from financial standpoint, i can see how making a low hanging fruit new game can be benetifial for financing, proving there is still value. But such a remake is very likely to not bring in much new audiences, so I doubt it is such a smart move. A remaster of the original, in true to original graphics, 3d, expanded islands and quests, beter controls....I'd love that for lba1. i wish that one was 3d already. For lba2 it doesn't make much sense as that one was already great. If the rebooth is redoing lba1, then there is no need for a remake/remaster. If a remaster is done in C&C style, simply uplifting the graphics, then sure, I'd love that. But that shouldn't take too much time from the new new game, which should be focus. Btw: on the naming thing, why not skip the numbers, and just ad new subtitels? Little Big Adventure - Relentless Little Big Adventure - Twinsen's odyssee Little Big Adventure - The Legend (reboot) Little Big Adventure - Alien Landing (reboot 2) Little Big Adventure - Stellar entity Genesis (reboot 3)
__________________
![]() |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Oh I like these names !
__________________
<((((((((((((([[[========================]]])))))))))))))> |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I meant it in the sense that Blizzard is publicly traded, so they have to care about shareholder value.
I also like the names, except for "stellar entity genesis" (which I know was the originally envisioned title). I think that just means "star birth" (which sounds dumber though)? "A New Star" is maybe better. Hard to say without knowing the plot ![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I think reboot consuming only twice memory as original would be possible, while still working on non-NT flavor of Windows, such as Windows Me!
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
... Why would they do that ?
__________________
<((((((((((((([[[========================]]])))))))))))))> |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
General question - Why remakes? | Dieblein2 | Fan Games | 7 | Today 02:17 |
My LBA remakes | Gonzo | Fan Music | 11 | 2008-09-08 22:19 |